This case study highlights the benefits of mapping the potential aspects of social inequalities that could be relevant to the topic you are interested in and describes some of the approaches that can be used.

This case study shows how a systematic review project can be informed by an iterative process with participation of people with lived experience on the topic.

This programme of research illustrates how an intersectional lens can be applied to diverse sources of secondary data to reveal previously hidden dimensions of inequality; how secondary sources can illuminate the intersection between biological markers of ill health and structural drivers of inequality.  This team are also developing innovative ways to disseminate their findings working with policy makers and other stakeholders to explore the policy and practice implications.

This case study raises an important question of how institutionalised racism might have impacted vaccine hesitancy – confidence, convenience, and complacency – to black and white communities differently.

This case study illustrates how research can explore potential structural drivers of unequal experiences/outcomes when not readily available in secondary data sources.

This case study reveals the benefits of careful consideration of the equity dimensions of the topic you wish to study including approaches to measurement and illustrates the implications of context mapping for question formulation, study design, analysis and policy/practice recommendations.

This case study warns against using social categories, such as race, ethnicity, and sex, as additive variables.

The work of Magina Agénor illustrates the importance of integrating intersecting dimensions of inequalities in research questions. It also shows options for exploring structural drivers of unequal experiences when relevant data are not available in secondary data sources.

This case study is an opinion piece. It demonstrates the value of integrating a focus on wider structural determinants in the construction of questions and the design of research evaluating behavioural or lifestyle public health interventions.

This qualitative study illustrates how the application of an intersectional lens to the analyses of qualitative data can reveal limitations of health care interventions that aim to improve access to care.

This case study describes the development of a framework that can be used to develop equity sensitive programme theories that in turn will shape the design and conduct of systematic reviews resulting in findings that have greater potential to influence action to reduce socio- inequalities in health.

This case study highlights the importance of applying an antiracism lens to research.   It includes discussion of study design and dissemination and has a strong focus on the role of community engagement as co-creators of research.